Both tend to quickly degenerate into " so why do they call it RationalWiki, then?" This may be based on a slight confusion between rationalisation and rationalism - as no one ever thinks they're being irrational, they're likely to accuse anyone who disagrees with them of being irrational. RW has numerous critics, roughly divided in two (overlapping) groups: those that take issue with the content and those who take issue with the style. See the main article on this topic: RationalWiki:Pissed at us When one side of an issue has the scientific consensus to back it up, and the other clearly doesn't, part of our mission is placing the two side by side and calling it like we sees it. Wikipedia) is that we openly avoid any pretentions to neutrality on controversial subjects. One of many ways which distinguishes RW from encyclopedias (e.g.While RW has a serious mission, it is ultimately a volunteer project - and as such, an important way to keep interest high is to ensure that our articles are fun both to read and write.This focus on discussion captures the essence of Internet forums.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |